“In the past you could invent broken strategies or play a match in your own way. It’s impossible now”. Puppey on Dota evolution, missing TI and retirementInterview

TL;DR

  • Puppey identifies Dota 2’s evolution as restricting creative strategies and forcing standardized gameplay
  • Team Secret’s TI12 qualifier loss stemmed from laning failures and missed teamfight opportunities
  • Modern competitive Dota prioritizes objective control over individual innovation and unique playstyles
  • The legendary captain continues competing to prove his game knowledge rather than chase tournament victories
  • Age has transformed Puppey’s leadership style from ego-driven to wisdom-focused approaches

Games and Esports Articles Dota 2

Team Secret captain Clement “Puppey” Ivanov provided a detailed analysis of how competitive Dota 2 has fundamentally transformed over his legendary career. During an exclusive discussion with Cybersport.ru at BetBoom DACHA, he contrasted the creative freedom of earlier eras with today’s systematic, objective-driven gameplay structure. The veteran player also shared candid reflections on missing The International 2023 and his evolving perspective on professional longevity.

On missing TI12

Our performance fell significantly below expectations across multiple dimensions. The laning phase execution deviated completely from our strategic preparations and practice sessions. Realistically, we possessed the capability to secure a clean 2:0 victory against Quest Esports, but critical errors in the offlane disrupted our intended game tempo. Despite these setbacks, we generated one decisive teamfight victory that should have enabled a comeback, but failed to capitalize on the momentum shift. Their core heroes secured sufficient farm during our hesitation, ultimately closing out the match. <…>

I observed greater psychological pressure affecting my teammates, who missed their primary opportunity to compete at the prestigious tournament. Their performance shortcomings also eliminated my chance to maintain the unique record of attending every International event.

Honestly, I maintain philosophical perspective about the outcome. Competitive esports inevitably involves losses and missed qualifications as part of the natural cycle. This scenario could have materialized during previous years at TI7 or potentially even TI6. The possibility of missing TI existed throughout my career, but the reality manifested this season.

Clement “Puppey” Ivanov

“We are chasing legendary status. We want to become part of Dota history and reach higher than OG”. Mira on Spirit’s motivation and TI12 importance
Big goals for Team Spirit.

Why Puppey launched Dota after the TI12 qualifier knockout

My immediate instinct was to continue engaging with the game I’ve dedicated my career to mastering. I never considered concluding my competitive journey following that specific match outcome against Quest. Understanding the precise reasons for our defeat fueled my determination rather than discouragement. The frustration stemmed from knowing we possessed the capability to secure victory but failed execution. Post-elimination, my thought process centered on “What alternative activities hold meaning? Continuing to play represents my authentic path forward.”

Clement “Puppey” Ivanov
Source: flickr.com/photos/dota2ti/

What’s the motivation after so many years of competition

Demonstrating sustained competitive capability remains central to my professional identity. Despite the extensive timeline of my career, I continue proving my capacity to perform at elite levels. However, I acknowledge experiencing periods where game sense diminishes and decision quality suffers. This phenomenon rarely occurred during earlier competitive phases but manifests with increasing frequency in contemporary play.

The current Dota 2 landscape prohibits the creative experimentation that defined previous competitive eras. Historically, players could develop uniquely powerful strategies or establish distinctive match approaches diverging from conventional playstyles. Today, such innovation proves practically impossible as the game demands conformity to established patterns. Dota’s evolutionary trajectory reinforces this standardization through developer-imposed objective systems. Players must constantly pursue specific resources: Wisdom Runes requiring collection, Bounty Rune opportunities, Tormentor engagements. Continuous fighting and objective capture become mandatory rather than optional. The freedom to explore personalized strategies and unconventional tactics has been systematically eliminated. A universal game tempo now dictates all professional matches, requiring teams to operate within its constraints.

Victorious squads demonstrate superior comprehension of this standardized rhythm. Elite teams fundamentally understand victory conditions within the current framework. The metagame essentially dictates… How to articulate this concept in Russian? Understanding how to disrupt prevailing strategies remains crucial, but genuine meta-breaking innovations have disappeared from competitive play. This absence of revolutionary approaches has persisted for multiple seasons. No organizations introduce truly novel concepts, unexpected tactics, or inspire competitive imitation through innovation.

Clement “Puppey” Ivanov

Who is next Dota 2 hero after Muerta? Ring Master, Bird Samurai, and Eldor Wizard leaks tease 125th hero in Dota 2
What if we’ll have two heroes?

On possible retirement

Naturally, I’ve contemplated concluding my competitive career. [How intense are these considerations?] The retirement thoughts remain relatively mild (smiles). [Will you compete next season?] Absolutely. I don’t actively dwell on retirement timing, believing it should emerge organically when the appropriate moment arrives. I’ll recognize the conclusion point when certainty emerges, though that clarity hasn’t yet materialized.

Clement “Puppey” Ivanov

On becoming a softer leader

Definitely, the transformation is undeniable. Age represents the primary factor in this evolution. Maturity diminishes interest in previously significant competitive aspects. The compulsion to demonstrate personal greatness or importance gradually fades. Ego dimensions significantly reduce over time. Youth typically accompanies substantial ego investment, but perspective shifts with experience.

Currently, my remaining competitive drive focuses on validating continued game knowledge relevance. Establishing that my strategic insights maintain competitive value drives current motivations. Past achievements like tournament victory counts generate minimal personal pride anymore. Honestly, those historical accomplishments hold little emotional significance currently.

Clement “Puppey” Ivanov

“23savage is one of the best carries in the world”. Yatoro picked The International 2023 favorites and Talon is one of them

Action Checklist

  • Analyze laning phase execution compared to practice preparations to identify strategic gaps
  • Develop systematic objective control routines for Wisdom Runes, Bounty Runes, and Tormentors
  • Create post-defeat analysis framework to transform losses into learning opportunities
  • Establish career longevity assessment criteria separate from tournament results
  • Implement ego management strategies to maintain competitive drive without emotional attachment

No reproduction without permission:SeeYouSoon Game Club » “In the past you could invent broken strategies or play a match in your own way. It’s impossible now”. Puppey on Dota evolution, missing TI and retirementInterview Legendary Dota 2 captain Puppey reveals how competitive evolution changed creativity and discusses career longevity