T1 coaches on NA and EU improvement: Teams need to “find the issue inside them”

T1 coaches analyze Western League teams’ struggles and provide actionable improvement strategies

The Format Debate Intensifies

Recent international League of Legends tournaments have sparked intense discussion about competitive format fairness, with prominent Western coaches expressing frustration about structural disadvantages.

Following Cloud9’s decisive quarterfinal elimination by Gen.G at Worlds 2021, coach Alfonso ‘mithy’ Aguirre Rodríguez publicly criticized the professional League format as fundamentally “unfair” toward Western organizations. This perspective gained additional support from G2’s veteran jungler Marcin ‘Jankos’ Jankowski, who highlighted the significant game count disparity between Eastern and Western competitive circuits. However, T1 coaching staff members Stardust and Moment offered a contrasting viewpoint after their team’s semifinal confrontation with DWG KIA, asserting that the core issues reside within team structures and preparation methodologies rather than external format constraints.

Riot Games

Cloud9 coach Mithy was particularly vocal about the disadvantage western teams held in the current professional format “Having competed professionally in both North American and Korean environments, I can confirm that infrastructure differences extend beyond simple ping variations in solo queue,” Stardust elaborated. The 2021 World Championship represented a historical low point for Western League of Legends, with no teams from NA or EU securing a single victory during knockout stages despite Cloud9 (2-4) and MAD Lions (3-3) advancing from group competition. This disappointing outcome triggered widespread commentary from Western professionals regarding perceived systemic advantages enjoyed by LCK and LPL organizations.

Stardust’s Reality Check

“Considering their competitive results in recent international tournaments,” Stardust clarified, “Western organizations lack the standing to legitimately criticize structural elements. The privilege of format criticism should be reserved for teams that have demonstrated consistent excellence despite systemic challenges. For instance, if an organization like G2—with their history of international success—raised concerns about competitive structures, their perspective would carry legitimate weight. However, current Western performances don’t justify such complaints, indicating that teams should prioritize internal assessment and improvement.”

Riot Games

Cloud9 crashed out of Worlds in a 3-0 sweep to Gen.G Multiple Western franchises are preparing for substantial organizational restructuring during the upcoming offseason. G2 Esports has already moved three starting players and their head coach to substitute positions, while TSM faces potential departure of up to three core roster members. These staffing volatilities create significant challenges for developing consistent team synergy and strategic identity across seasons.

Western Teams’ Structural Challenges

The Western competitive landscape faces fundamental structural issues that extend beyond simple format complaints. Roster instability represents a critical problem, with North American and European teams demonstrating significantly higher player turnover rates compared to their Eastern counterparts. This constant personnel fluctuation prevents development of deep strategic synergy and coordinated team play that characterizes top LCK and LPL organizations.

Scouting and talent development pipelines in Western regions also lag behind Eastern models. While Korean and Chinese teams systematically identify and cultivate promising players through rigorous academy systems, Western organizations often prioritize importing established talent over developing domestic players. This approach creates dependency on imported players and inhibits long-term organizational growth and stylistic identity formation.

Moment’s Strategic Insights

Substantial organizational transformations await both North American and European competitive scenes. However, Coach Moment contends that genuine competitive advancement will originate from enhanced match preparation and strategic flexibility rather than format modifications. “Successful international competition requires meticulous opponent analysis and adaptive gameplay strategies,” he emphasized. Both Cloud9 and MAD Lions experienced comprehensive 3-0 defeats against Gen.G and DWG KIA respectively during knockout stages. Although individual matches within these series demonstrated competitive moments, the LCK representatives consistently outmaneuvered their Western opposition through superior draft strategies and in-game adaptation.

Eastern teams demonstrate systematic approaches to opponent preparation that Western organizations haven’t fully implemented. This includes detailed champion pool analysis, play pattern recognition, and contingency planning for various game states. The ability to dynamically adjust strategies mid-series based on opponent tendencies represents a crucial competitive differentiator that Western teams must develop to challenge Eastern dominance.

Practical Improvement Roadmap

Western organizations can implement several concrete strategies to bridge the competitive gap with Eastern teams. First, developing structured opponent analysis frameworks that extend beyond basic champion bans to include player tendency mapping and objective control patterns. Second, establishing consistent scrimmage environments with clear developmental objectives rather than simply playing practice games.

Common mistakes Western teams should avoid include overemphasizing individual mechanical skill at the expense of team coordination, neglecting regional meta development in favor of copying Eastern strategies, and insufficient investment in sports psychology and player development programs. Advanced optimization involves creating flexible draft systems that allow multiple strategic pathways and developing players’ decision-making autonomy during high-pressure situations.

While discussions regarding League of Legends competitive format parity will undoubtedly persist, the central question remains whether Western organizations can implement the necessary structural and strategic changes to genuinely challenge LCK dominance moving into the 2022 competitive season and beyond.

No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » T1 coaches on NA and EU improvement: Teams need to “find the issue inside them” T1 coaches analyze Western League teams' struggles and provide actionable improvement strategies