TL;DR
- Valve’s new Pick’Ems format requires accurate category predictions rather than 3-0 team guessing
- Elimination Stage submissions close around March 31, 13:00 CET based on previous stage patterns
- Brazilian teams outperformed expectations, ruining many players’ Diamond Coin hopes
- Multiple access methods available including mobile devices and alternative PCs
- Pro predictions reveal consensus on advancing teams and potential upsets
Games and Esports Articles CS 2
Valve has officially launched the Elimination Stage Pick’Ems for the PGL CS2 Major Copenhagen 2024, marking a critical phase for competitive predictions. The Opening Stage delivered significant upsets that shattered Diamond Coin aspirations for countless participants, with established squads like ENCE and Apeks making unexpected early exits. Meanwhile, Brazilian representatives demonstrated remarkable performance levels that exceeded most analysts’ preseason forecasts.
The revamped prediction system introduced by Valve represents a fundamental shift in how participants approach tournament forecasting. Rather than focusing on identifying the team that will achieve a perfect 3-0 record, you must now accurately predict which squads will advance from specific competitive categories. This strategic adjustment demands deeper tournament knowledge and more nuanced team analysis compared to previous Major events.
How to make Pick’Ems
Valve’s restructured prediction framework requires participants to correctly identify advancing teams across multiple classification groups rather than focusing on perfect record performances. The elimination of the 3-0 team advancement requirement fundamentally alters prediction dynamics and reward structures. Crucially, the platform maintains full accessibility across devices, enabling submission from smartphones or secondary computers when primary gaming systems are unavailable.
How to do Copenhagen Major Pick’Ems if you can’t enter CS2? Making Pick’Ems on mobile or another PC
Getting Diamond Coin on mobile.
For optimal Pick’Ems strategy, begin by analyzing team performance data from the Opening Stage, paying particular attention to map-specific strengths and recent roster changes. Many participants underestimate the importance of studying head-to-head matchups and player form fluctuations throughout tournament progression. Avoid the common mistake of overvaluing historical team reputation while ignoring current competitive momentum and tactical adaptations.
Advanced prediction techniques involve cross-referencing multiple analyst opinions while considering map veto patterns that could influence advancement probabilities. The flexibility to submit predictions through mobile interfaces provides significant advantages for last-minute adjustments based on final roster confirmations or unexpected team developments.
When CS2 Major Copenhagen Pick’Ems close (time and date)
Valve has not formally announced the precise cutoff timing for Elimination Stage Pick’Ems submissions. This creates an exceptionally narrow submission window since the Elimination Stage commences on March 31, at 13:00 CET. Based on closure patterns observed during the previous tournament phase, this start time likely corresponds with the prediction deadline.
Strategic timing management becomes crucial given the compressed submission period. Experienced participants recommend preparing preliminary predictions well in advance while leaving flexibility for final adjustments based on last-minute team news or performance indicators. The absence of an official deadline announcement necessitates proactive monitoring of tournament communications and community updates.
To maximize prediction accuracy while accommodating the tight deadline, establish a systematic approach that includes monitoring pre-match analyst discussions, reviewing recent scrimmage results, and considering potential roster substitutions that could impact team performance dynamics.
Best Copenhagen Major Pick’Ems — pro player and analysts predictions
Karrigan
Karrigan’s predictions reflect his deep understanding of international team dynamics, with particular emphasis on squad cohesion during high-pressure elimination scenarios. His identification of Imperial as a potential 0-3 candidate demonstrates how professional analysis differs from community consensus.
Pimp
Pimp’s selections showcase a balanced approach between established powerhouse teams and emerging dark horse contenders. His methodology incorporates both statistical performance metrics and qualitative assessment of team mentality under tournament pressure.
Fl0m
OhnePixel
GeT_RiGhT
Innersh1ne (ex-FaZe, MOUZ analyst, former BetBoom coach)
Innersh1ne brings unique analytical perspective drawn from his coaching background and team strategy development experience.
Thour (CS2 enthusiast)
Analyzing these professional predictions reveals several consensus trends regarding team advancement probabilities and potential bracket-shaking upsets. The diversity of analytical approaches highlights how different methodologies can yield varying yet equally valuable insights for tournament prediction optimization.
Europe loses one slot at Shanghai Major after Opening Stage in Copenhagen, might lose more
Action Checklist
- Review Opening Stage performance data and head-to-head matchups
- Analyze professional predictions for consensus trends and outlier insights
- Prepare mobile access setup for last-minute submission capability
- Monitor tournament communications for official deadline confirmation
- Submit predictions before March 31, 13:00 CET deadline
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » PGL CS2 Major Copenhagen 2024 Elimination (Legends) Stage pro and talent Pick’Ems. When Group Stage Pick’Ems close Master CS2 Major Copenhagen Pick'Ems with expert predictions, deadline strategies, and mobile access tips