Two LAPD officers fired for Pokemon Go negligence during robbery, Supreme Court denies appeal
The Incident: Gaming Over Duty
Two Los Angeles Police Department officers faced termination after choosing virtual creature hunting over responding to an urgent robbery call at Macy’s Crenshaw Plaza. Their decision to prioritize Pokemon Go gameplay during an active crime situation led to career-ending consequences.
Los Angeles Police Department officers Louis Lozano and Eric Mitchell lost their final legal appeal after termination for abandoning robbery response duties to capture Pokemon characters.The incident originally occurred in 2017
when officers received urgent backup requests concerning an ongoing robbery at Crenshaw Plaza’s Macy’s location. Instead of responding, Lozano and Mitchell initiated a 20-minute Pokemon hunting expedition after one officer excitedly announced a Snorlax appearance. Their patrol vehicle’s digital recording system captured extensive discussions about Pokemon strategies and creature locations while they neglected emergency duties.
PokemonPublic safety responsibilities should always outweigh mobile gaming pursuits during active duty hours. Audio recordings revealed intense gameplay moments, including one officer exclaiming about creature resistance during capture attempts before successfully obtaining a Togetic character.
Legal Battle and Supreme Court Decision
Following their successful virtual creature capture, the officers reportedly discussed how colleagues would envy their Pokemon acquisitions. Both individuals acknowledged departing from their assigned patrol route specifically to pursue the Snorlax sighting, resulting in their 2018 dismissal from the police force. On April 20, 2022, they presented their case before California’s highest judicial authority.
NianticTermination resulted from inappropriate Pokemon Go usage during official police duties. According to Bloomberg Law reporting, the officers failed to persuade the California Supreme Court that their vehicle recordings were improperly utilized in the termination decision process. The court determined the evidence was admissible and supported the department’s disciplinary actions.
Professional Conduct Lessons
This situation provides crucial insights for gaming enthusiasts regarding professional boundary management. The case demonstrates how mobile gaming distractions can compromise critical responsibilities, particularly in public service roles where community safety depends on officer availability and attention.
For professionals in high-responsibility positions, establishing clear boundaries between personal interests and occupational duties is essential. Mobile gaming should never interfere with time-sensitive responsibilities or emergency response capabilities. Organizations should consider implementing specific policies regarding personal device usage during critical operational periods.
The legal outcome establishes significant precedent for workplace accountability regarding technology distractions. Employers have legitimate grounds for disciplinary action when personal activities demonstrably interfere with professional obligations, especially in public safety roles.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Cops fired for ignoring robbery to catch Snorlax in Pokemon Go denied court review Two LAPD officers fired for Pokemon Go negligence during robbery, Supreme Court denies appeal