Apex Legends players demand ranked queue reforms with level requirements and phone verification to combat smurfing
Community Demands Ranked Queue Reform
The Apex Legends competitive community is rallying for significant changes to ranked matchmaking requirements, specifically targeting minimum level thresholds to address persistent smurfing issues.
Ranked competitive modes across gaming platforms consistently face systemic challenges that undermine fair play. From skill-based manipulation to outright cheating, these problems create frustrating experiences for dedicated players seeking legitimate competition.
Smurf accounts—secondary profiles created by experienced players to dominate lower-ranked lobbies—represent one of the most disruptive issues. These accounts often belong to skilled competitors who intentionally avoid their true ranking brackets, creating unbalanced matches that punish legitimate players.
Boosted players present another significant concern. These accounts artificially climb rankings through paid services or coordinated manipulation, entering skill tiers where they cannot perform adequately. This creates frustrating teammate experiences and undermines the integrity of ranked progression systems.
The Apex Legends player base has mobilized around these issues, organizing collective demands for developer intervention. Their primary request focuses on increasing minimum requirements for ranked participation, which they believe would significantly reduce disruptive account behaviors.
The Level 10 Requirement Problem
In a Reddit discussion initiated on August 6th, community member Mayors_Son highlighted the stagnation of ranked requirements. The player questioned why participation thresholds haven’t evolved despite three years of competitive development and player growth.
Ranked Leagues debuted during Season 2 with a single requirement: account level 10. This threshold represents minimal gameplay experience—approximately 2-4 hours for most players. Despite multiple ranked system overhauls and meta shifts, this foundational requirement remains unchanged.
“Can we not have ranked locked behind level 50 at least,” Mayors_Son proposed. “Half the teams in platinum lobbies feature smurf accounts. We encounter level 25 players with 10 total eliminations dominating matches. The pattern is obvious and frustrating. Respawn Entertainment is damaging the experience for above-average competitors,” they elaborated.
Practical Tip: When encountering suspected smurf accounts, utilize the in-game reporting system specifically for “Cheating” or “Gameplay Sabotage” categories. While not immediately visible, consistent reporting creates data patterns that developers can analyze for systemic solutions.
Common Mistake: Many players underestimate the time investment required for legitimate skill development. Reaching level 50 typically represents 25-40 hours of gameplay—sufficient time to understand basic mechanics, map layouts, and legend abilities before entering competitive environments.
Phone Verification Proposals
Alternative solutions emerged within the community discussion, with several participants advocating for phone number verification systems. This approach has gained popularity across competitive gaming titles as an effective deterrent against account proliferation.
“Ranked access should require connected mobile verification,” one community member suggested. “Dota 2 implemented this years ago with significant smurf reduction, though the system isn’t perfect.” Another added: “Simply mandating phone number association would mostly resolve the issue.”
Dota 2’s successful implementation demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach. The Valve-developed MOBA requires unique phone numbers for ranked participation, significantly increasing the effort required to create smurf accounts. Overwatch adopted similar systems with measurable improvements in competitive integrity.
Optimization Tip: Advanced players concerned about ranked integrity should consider forming consistent squads rather than solo queueing. Pre-made teams eliminate the randomness of teammate selection and provide coordinated communication advantages. Additionally, maintaining positive behavior scores through sportsmanlike conduct improves matchmaking quality over time.
Comparative Analysis: Unlike Apex Legends’ static requirements, games like Rainbow Six Siege and Valorant employ dynamic systems that adjust based on player behavior and performance metrics. These approaches create more nuanced barriers to ranked access than simple level thresholds.
Community Sentiment and Future Prospects
Warzone is nerfing SBMM in Season 1 but players aren’t convinced
Apex Legends quietly announce matchmaking update with big solo queue changes
Apex Legends fans convinced there’s a big reason why player count won’t grow
As Apex Legends approaches its fourth anniversary, community pressure mounts on Respawn Entertainment to address these longstanding concerns. The developer team faces balancing acts between accessibility for new players and competitive integrity for veterans.
Historical patterns suggest Respawn monitors community feedback channels closely, with previous ranked system adjustments following sustained player advocacy. However, implementation timelines remain unpredictable, leaving the community awaiting concrete responses to their proposals.
The coming seasons will reveal whether these demands translate into tangible system changes. With competitive gaming’s increasing emphasis on fair play standards, Apex Legends may need to adapt its ranked requirements to maintain player trust and competitive viability.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Apex Legends players demand Ranked changes to avoid bad teammates Apex Legends players demand ranked queue reforms with level requirements and phone verification to combat smurfing