The Finals devs respond to accusations of slowed gameplay: “There was no change”

Understanding The Finals gameplay speed perception issues and practical FOV optimization solutions

The Player Perception Problem

The Finals community has voiced widespread concerns about gameplay pacing feeling noticeably slower compared to the beta experience. This perception shift has sparked significant discussion across gaming forums and review platforms.

The Finals’ Steam review ratings experienced a temporary decline to “mixed” status, with numerous players specifically citing reduced movement speed as their primary complaint. Interestingly, development team analysis confirms no actual changes were made to core movement mechanics between versions.

The Finals emerged as a groundbreaking FPS innovation that captivated the gaming community. Following an exceptionally popular beta phase that surpassed established titles like Call of Duty and Counter-Strike in concurrent players, the complete version launched unexpectedly during The Game Awards 2023 ceremony.

The official release maintained the beta’s impressive momentum, with the new title briefly outperforming Modern Warfare 3 on Steam charts while attracting over 200,000 simultaneous players during peak hours.

Despite this commercial success, The Finals accumulated approximately 8,000 negative Steam reviews primarily focused on perceived gameplay slowdown. The development team addressed these concerns through Discord communications with initial puzzlement about the reported changes.

Technical Analysis: What Actually Changed

Examining The Finals’ Steam reviews reveals extensive commentary about altered movement pacing. Many negative ratings feature straightforward demands like “Revert the speed cowards” as their primary feedback.

Embark Studios maintains that character movement speed remains technically unchanged since the beta testing phase. However, the team has identified several contributing factors and proposed potential solutions through their Discord communications.

“We’ve thoroughly investigated community feedback regarding movement perception changes between the Open Beta and current version. This proved challenging to identify since neither movement systems nor speed values were modified between testing phases,” explained Embark community lead Dusty Gustafsson.

“Over the past month, we implemented minor adjustments to animations, audio cues, and configuration defaults that collectively may create the impression of reduced movement pace,” the developer clarified. The most significant factor appears to be the default Field of View setting adjustment from 100 to 71.

Field of View (FOV) dramatically affects speed perception in first-person games. Lower FOV settings create a “zoomed-in” effect that makes environments appear to move past more slowly, while higher FOV provides wider peripheral vision that enhances the sensation of velocity. This psychological effect explains why many players feel their characters move slower despite identical movement values.

Practical Optimization Guide

Gustafsson confirmed that Embark will reevaluate certain animation modifications, but players can immediately address speed perception issues through settings adjustments. “From the player perspective, modifying your FOV configuration can substantially improve the situation,” the developer recommended.

Optimal FOV Settings: For maximum speed perception, set FOV between 95-110. Higher values increase peripheral movement cues that enhance velocity sensation. However, extremely high FOV may cause distortion at screen edges.

Common Configuration Mistakes: Many players overlook motion blur and camera shake settings. Disabling motion blur typically improves movement clarity, while reducing camera shake can minimize visual distractions that impair speed perception.

Advanced Performance Tips: Competitive players should experiment with different FOV values in training mode to find their personal optimal setting. Combine FOV adjustments with frame rate optimization for the smoothest gameplay experience.

For additional The Finals assistance, we provide comprehensive guides to help players excel during the early adoption phase.

Best The Finals Medium build | Best The Finals Light build | The Finals best settings: Max FPS & competitive advantages | Does The Finals have aim assist? | The Finals file size on PC, PS5, Xbox | How to change your name | Is The Finals on PS4 and Xbox One? | Is The Finals on Xbox Game Pass? | How to add and invite friends | How many players play The Finals | The Finals system requirements: Minimum and Recommended PC specs | Can you play The Finals on Steam Deck?

Community Response and Future Updates

Warzone is nerfing SBMM in Season 1 but players aren’t convinced

Black Ops 7 dev responds as performance issues make the game “unplayable” on console

Black Ops 7 streamers convinced SBMM is as strong as ever despite changes

The gaming community continues to monitor Embark Studios’ response to gameplay perception feedback. The developers have demonstrated commendable transparency in investigating these concerns despite the technical challenge of addressing perceived rather than actual performance changes.

Future updates may include refined animation systems, additional FOV options, and enhanced visual feedback mechanisms to better align player perception with actual game mechanics. The ongoing dialogue between developers and community represents a positive model for live service game development.

No reproduction without permission:SeeYouSoon Game Club » The Finals devs respond to accusations of slowed gameplay: “There was no change” Understanding The Finals gameplay speed perception issues and practical FOV optimization solutions