TL;DR
- Maxwell’s cure offers immediate stability but may limit long-term character development options
- Lena’s solution provides narrative flexibility but introduces additional resource management challenges
- Delaying MRI construction increases clone anxiety, requiring daily intervention to maintain morale
- The choice permanently affects character relationships and available story branches in Act 3
- Resource planning for 100 metals/minerals should begin early to avoid progression bottlenecks
GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.
Facing the critical choice between Maxwell’s treatment approach and Lena’s alternative solution in The Alters represents one of the most impactful narrative crossroads in your campaign. This decision carries substantial consequences that resonate throughout your entire playthrough, affecting character relationships, available missions, and endgame outcomes. Our comprehensive analysis prepares you for every potential scenario while respecting that this guide contains significant story spoilers.
The pivotal moment arrives shortly after initiating Act 2, triggered by the unfortunate demise of Molly, your cloned sheep companion. Jan Scientist’s subsequent autopsy reveals disturbing findings that send shockwaves through your team. The resulting sequence becomes one of the game’s most intense periods, combining time-sensitive objectives with delicate interpersonal management as you race to address the crisis.
Before committing to either Maxwell’s or Lena’s proposed solutions, thoroughly investigate Molly’s circumstances. Conversations with Jan Scientist uncover that rapidium—the identical substance facilitating your alternate Jans’ cloning—potentially caused the animal’s sudden death. This revelation implies your own clones face similar unexpected termination risks.
Successfully navigating this critical juncture requires meticulous preparation across several key areas:
Pro Tip: Begin gathering metal and mineral resources during Act 1’s conclusion to avoid progression delays. The anxiety mechanic intensifies dramatically with each passing day, potentially derailing your mission progress if neglected. For broader strategic context, consult our Complete Guide to resource management systems.
Following these preparatory measures, you’ll engage in crucial communications with the Scientist and subsequently Lucas via the Communication Room. These interactions unveil the two divergent solution pathways proposed by Maxwell and Lena respectively.
Maxwell’s proposed solution emphasizes technological intervention and systematic risk mitigation. His approach focuses on stabilizing the rapidium instability through controlled environmental modifications and specialized equipment deployment.
Key Advantages: This method typically provides more predictable outcomes with reduced immediate risks to your current clone roster. However, it often requires substantial ongoing resource investment and may limit certain character development opportunities in later acts.
Common Pitfall: Players frequently underestimate the long-term resource demands of Maxwell’s approach, leading to shortages during critical Act 3 missions. Plan your Weapons Unlock priorities accordingly to maintain combat effectiveness while managing cure-related expenses.
The scientific rigor behind Maxwell’s methodology appeals to players preferring methodical, calculated progression with minimized narrative surprises.
Lena’s alternative treatment path embraces experimental biological adaptations and calculated risk acceptance. Her solution involves harnessing the rapidium’s properties rather than suppressing them, creating potential for unexpected character evolutions.
Strategic Benefits: This approach unlocks unique dialogue trees and relationship developments unavailable through Maxwell’s conservative methodology. However, it introduces variable success rates and potential companion instability.
Optimization Tip: Players selecting Lena’s cure should prioritize social interaction missions and dialogue depth over pure resource accumulation. Understanding Class Guide dynamics becomes crucial for managing the increased interpersonal complexity.
Lena’s path particularly suits players valuing emergent storytelling and character-driven narratives over predictable, optimized outcomes.
Your selection between these competing cures irrevocably shapes your campaign’s trajectory. Maxwell’s approach typically maintains team stability but may restrict certain late-game narrative possibilities, while Lena’s method introduces more variables but enables richer character arcs.
Immediate Impact: The chosen solution immediately affects clone morale, available mission types, and character availability for specific operations.
Long-term Ramifications: The cure decision influences which characters survive Act 2’s conclusion, what relationship dynamics carry forward, and which story resolutions become achievable in your final act.
Critical Consideration: Neither choice represents a universally “correct” path—your decision should align with your preferred playstyle and narrative priorities for the campaign’s conclusion.
Action Checklist
- Begin stockpiling 100 metal and 100 mineral units during Act 1’s final missions
- Construct MRI Upgrade immediately upon Act 2 commencement to minimize clone anxiety
- Schedule all MRI scans post-2100 while maintaining daily clone morale checks
- Evaluate your preferred playstyle: methodical (Maxwell) vs experimental (Lena)
- Commit to your chosen cure path and adapt your resource allocation strategy accordingly
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Should You Pick The Cure From Maxwell Or Lena In The Alters? Strategic guide to choosing between Maxwell's cure or Lena's cure in The Alters Act 2 with consequences analysis