A comprehensive guide to solo raid viability in Pokemon Go: why players want changes, strategic adaptations, and future possibilities
The Evolution and Current State of Pokemon Go Raids
Trainers across the globe are voicing a significant request to developer Niantic: re-evaluate the mandatory multiplayer requirement for high-tier raids, even if it means accepting diminished rewards. This growing sentiment draws direct inspiration from the solo-friendly Tera Raid system in Pokemon Scarlet & Violet.
As a cornerstone feature since 2017, Raids drive the core gameplay loop of catching, training, and battling. However, a shifting player landscape has trainers advocating for a fundamental redesign to better accommodate solo and small-group playstyles.
The raid mechanic debuted nearly unchanged from its original implementation: a cooperative battle where up to 20 trainers deploy teams of six Pokemon against a powerful Raid Boss. This design inherently favors densely populated areas with active player bases.
Over time, raids evolved into the primary method for obtaining Legendary Pokemon and the crucial Mega Energy required for Mega Evolution. The 2020 introduction of Remote Raid Passes was a watershed moment, temporarily democratizing access by allowing global collaboration regardless of physical location.
The current climate presents new challenges. With Remote Raids now behind a paywall and many local communities dissolving or becoming inactive, trainers face increased isolation. This friction has sparked direct comparisons to the more accessible Tera Raid battles in Pokemon Scarlet & Violet, where skilled preparation can lead to solo victories.
While raiding excels as a social activity, its difficulty curve creates frustration. One- to three-star raids offer a satisfying solo challenge, but the game’s design mandates assembling a small army of seven or more trainers for any chance at conquering four-star and five-star raids. This binary accessibility gap is a primary source of player discontent.
Community Sentiment: Trading Rewards for Accessibility
This structural barrier particularly affects players without reliable raid groups. A poignant Reddit post by user ighorlobianco captured the collective frustration: “I see so many raids I can’t do for lack of people/community. If soloing were possible, I would give a lot more money to Niantic.” The post posed a telling question to the community: “If raids were soloable, but with fewer rewards, would you do more raids?”
The response was overwhelmingly affirmative. The discussion revealed a clear hierarchy of value among rewards. Most commenters prioritized capturing the Raid Boss Pokemon, earning Candy for powering it up, and obtaining Mega Energy above all else. Items like Golden Razz Berries, Rare Candy, and TMs were frequently cited as acceptable sacrifices for the trade-off of solo accessibility.
Pokemon Go Raid Boss schedule (January 2026)
Pokemon Scarlet & Violet Tera Raid events: Dates, times, Pokemon & Tera Types
Pokemon Go players divided as some refuse to collaborate in Max Battles
This stance highlights a stark contrast with Pokemon Scarlet & Violet’s Tera Raids. The main series games provide a challenging but ultimately surmountable solo experience for well-prepared trainers. Success hinges on strategic Pokemon selection, type matching, and understanding battle mechanics—a skill-based challenge currently absent from Pokemon Go’s highest-tier raids, which are primarily tests of player coordination and numbers.
The willingness to forfeit a portion of the reward pool underscores a significant design philosophy divergence. Scarlet & Violet players enjoy substantial rewards for solo victories, whereas a substantial segment of the Pokemon Go community is prepared to accept less in exchange for the fundamental ability to participate in all raid content on their own terms.
Strategic Adaptations for Limited Raid Groups
Practical Tip: Focus your resources on mastering Tier 3 raids. These provide the best solo challenge and reward ratio. Identify Pokemon with double weaknesses (like Tyranitar to Fighting) and build a team of six high-level counters to consistently win without help.
Common Mistake: Wasting Stardust and Candy on suboptimal raid attackers. Avoid powering up Pokemon with low Attack IVs or the wrong moveset for raiding. Use apps like Pokegenie to simulate battle performance before investing. A level 30 Pokemon with the ideal moveset often outperforms a level 40 with a poor one.
For trainers attempting 4-star or 5-star raids with only 2-4 players, optimization is non-negotiable. Every trainer must deploy teams of level 35+ Pokemon with ideal movesets that exploit the boss’s double weakness. Coordinate types to avoid redundancy; having six trainers all using the same top counter is less effective than covering different secondary weaknesses. Mega Evolve a Pokemon that boosts your entire team’s damage output for that type.
Optimization for Advanced Players: Leverage weather boosts and event bonuses. Raid during weather that increases your counter’s damage (e.g., Sunny for Fire types). Save Premium Battle Passes for raid hours or events featuring bosses you desperately need. Farm Max Revives and Hyper Potions from gym spins to maintain raid tempo without spending resources.
Resource management becomes critical. Prioritize raiding for Pokemon that are meta-relevant for future raids (e.g., a powerful Ice-type for Dragon bosses). Use Pinap Berries on bosses you plan to power up, and Golden Razz only for critical catches. Consider creating a dedicated “Raid Team” tag in your Pokemon storage for quick team selection.
The Future of Raiding: Potential Solutions and Design Considerations
Looking forward, several models could bridge the accessibility gap. A scalable difficulty system would allow a raid’s HP and damage output to adjust dynamically based on the number of trainers in the lobby, making all raids technically soloable but significantly harder alone.
A dynamic reward tier model could directly address community feedback. Completing a 5-star raid solo might guarantee the Pokemon encounter and a small amount of Candy, but additional rewards like Rare Candy, TMs, and Stardust would scale with the number of participants or the speed of completion.
Niantic could also explore hybrid approaches. Introduce a new “Solo Challenge” mode for each raid boss with a strict time limit and fixed, reduced rewards. Alternatively, implement a matchmaking system that functions like Remote Raids but automatically pairs solo players into groups, addressing the community issue directly.
The core tension lies in balancing Niantic’s vision of a location-based, social game with the practical realities of its global player base. The success of Scarlet & Violet’s soloable raids proves there is demand for challenging single-player endgame content. Integrating a version of this philosophy into Pokemon Go—perhaps through special “Elite Solo Raids” or a revised difficulty curve—could satisfy a large segment of the frustrated player base while preserving the social core for those who prefer it.
Ultimately, the strong community sentiment indicates that the current all-or-nothing approach to high-tier raids is unsustainable for many. Providing a viable, reward-scaled path for dedicated solo trainers would not diminish the social experience but would instead make the game more inclusive and potentially more engaging for its entire audience.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Pokemon Go players want Raids to be more like Pokemon Scarlet & Violet’s A comprehensive guide to solo raid viability in Pokemon Go: why players want changes, strategic adaptations, and future possibilities