Pokemon fan with classic game claims Wata swapped it for a copy

Essential guide to avoiding grading service mishaps with actionable collector protection strategies

The Shocking Discovery

A Pokemon collector experienced every collector’s worst nightmare when they discovered their graded rare game wasn’t the same copy they originally submitted for professional assessment.

A grading service error appears to have resulted in a Pokemon Colosseum game swap, leaving one collector devastated after Wata Games allegedly returned a different copy than what was submitted.

Reddit user u/kazuya955 shared their distressing experience in a detailed post, explaining how they sent an Italian version of Pokemon Colosseum for GameCube grading, only to receive back what they believe is a completely different copy of the same title.

The collector’s initial comment, “Wata might have swapped my game… more in the comments,” was followed by a comprehensive breakdown of the alarming situation that unfolded over several months.

“Last year I submitted an Italian Pokemon Colosseum for GameCube to Wata for professional grading,” kazuya995 explained. “The game returned with an impressive 9.8 A+ grade, but months later I made the chilling realization that the copy in the sealed case wasn’t the one I originally sent them.”

Evidence of the Swap

The collector meticulously documented three critical differences that prove the returned game wasn’t their original submission:

  • The Nintendo red strip seal placement showed noticeable positional variation between the submitted and returned copies
  • The SIAE authentication sticker (a gold hologram exclusive to Italian media products including games, VHS, and DVDs) displayed both positional differences and a completely unique identification number – each SIAE sticker carries individual serialization
  • Specific manufacturer markings present on the back of the original game cartridge were completely absent from the graded version they received back
  • These discrepancies form compelling evidence of a substitution, particularly the SIAE sticker variation, as these government-mandated authentication markers cannot be replicated or transferred between media items.

    For collectors, understanding these authentication markers is crucial. The SIAE (Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori) system provides unique identification for licensed media in Italy, making each game copy technically distinct and traceable through its registration number.

    Community Reactions

    The evidence appears convincing if verified, though Wata Games has not yet issued an official response. Meanwhile, the Pokemon collecting community has erupted with reactions and shared experiences.

    One community member commented, “This confirms my suspicions: WATA operates questionably – avoid them entirely.” Another respondent questioned, “Given Wata’s multiple controversies over recent years, what motivated your decision to use their services initially?”

    The incident has reignited discussions about Wata’s business practices, including previous allegations of grade inflation and questionable authentication processes that have circulated within collector forums for years.

    Many experienced collectors recommended alternative grading services like CGC (Certified Guaranty Company) or VGA (Video Game Authority), noting their more established track records and transparent authentication procedures for video game collectibles.

    Protection Strategies

    This incident underscores critical protective measures every collector should implement before submitting valuable games for grading:

    Always create comprehensive photographic documentation of your collectibles from multiple angles before submission. Capture clear images of serial numbers, authentication stickers, unique markings, and any distinguishing characteristics that prove ownership of that specific copy.

    Research grading companies thoroughly before selection. Look beyond marketing claims and investigate their authentication protocols, handling procedures, and historical complaint records. Consider using services that provide detailed tracking and verification throughout the grading process.

    Implement additional safeguards like micro-etching invisible identification marks in discreet locations or using UV-reactive markers that won’t affect grade evaluation but provide undeniable proof of ownership.

    For international collectors, understand that regional variants often contain country-specific authentication systems like Italy’s SIAE, France’s SACEM, or Germany’s GEMA markings that provide additional verification layers.

    GameStop defends trade-in values after customer swaps Pokemon card for record $30K

    Pokemon scalper under fire for bringing a child along while grabbing cards

    Top 15 best Pokemon games of all time

    No reproduction without permission:SeeYouSoon Game Club » Pokemon fan with classic game claims Wata swapped it for a copy Essential guide to avoiding grading service mishaps with actionable collector protection strategies