Hi-Rez Studios reverses AI voice cloning policy after industry backlash, setting precedent for ethical gaming practices
The AI Voice Controversy Erupts
Hi-Rez Studios, renowned for developing popular games Paladins and Smite, faced substantial community opposition after their artificial intelligence voice acting initiatives became public knowledge. The studio’s plans to implement AI technology for voice replication encountered immediate resistance across social media platforms.
Significant public outcry emerged when voice professionals and gaming enthusiasts discovered Hi-Rez Studios’ intention to utilize artificial intelligence for voice duplication, prompting swift corporate reconsideration.
Artificial intelligence implementation in creative industries has become increasingly contentious. Recent technological advancements have positioned AI at the center of digital discourse, with content creators, vocal performers, authors, and numerous creative professionals expressing concerns about potential displacement and ethical considerations.
The situation escalated when voice actor Henry Schrader uncovered contractual provisions that would permit Hi-Rez Studios to employ artificial intelligence for replicating performer voices without adequate safeguards.
Contract Clauses Under Scrutiny
Henry Schrader’s social media disclosure attracted such widespread attention that Hi-Rez Studios President Stewart Chisam intervened publicly, presenting a revised contract rider via Twitter to address mounting concerns.
For those unfamiliar with the situation, Hi-Rez Studios, developers behind Paladins and Smite, indicated plans to employ AI technology for voice replication while declining to incorporate protective language in performer agreements. Additional context available in the discussion thread. Please circulate among voice acting colleagues. (1/?)
Chisam’s initial reaction involved challenging the voice actor’s assertions, characterizing them as inaccurate. The executive highlighted specific contractual language stating:
“Client agrees not to use, or sublicense, the Performance to simulate Talent’s voice or likeness to create any synthesized or “digital double” voice or likeness of Talent.”
Subsequently, voice actor Marin M. Miller contributed to the conversation, alleging that Hi-Rez Studios maintained provisions allowing voice simulation during circumstances involving performer death or incapacity preventing future performances.
Executive Response and Resolution
The situation has generated considerable discussion, but since individuals requested verification, consider the CEO’s own statements: “incapacity that leaves talent unable to perform at any forseeable time” represents notably broad terminology. If limited to posthumous rights, that would represent different circumstances. pic.twitter.com/IVeBVZFvs2
As the discussion gained momentum, Chisam defended the original contractual approach, explaining that during initial review, the mortality clause appeared reasonable. Additionally, Chisam characterized the provision as one they “didn’t really prioritize significantly and the situations warranting its application remain exceptionally limited.”
Morgan Freeman takes legal action against AI companies stealing his voice: “I’m pissed off”
IShowSpeed hits back at viral AI videos of him that look “too real”
Jake Paul hits back at viral AI videos mocking him
Revised rider documentation provided. pic.twitter.com/OCPRFttJrD
Shortly thereafter, Chisam returned to the Twitter conversation to present the updated rider, which now explicitly states “Client agrees not to use, or sublicense the Performance to simulate Talent’s voice or likeness or to create any synthesized or ‘digital double’ voice or likeness of Talent.”
Industry Implications and Future Outlook
This incident likely represents merely the initial confrontation regarding artificial intelligence implementation within gaming environments. As technological capabilities advance and AI assumes greater prominence, similar disputes will inevitably emerge throughout the industry.
Practical Guidance for Voice Actors: When reviewing contracts, specifically examine clauses related to “digital replication,” “voice simulation,” or “post-performance usage rights.” Seek explicit language prohibiting AI training using your vocal performances without separate compensation and consent.
Industry Best Practices: Game developers should establish clear ethical guidelines for AI implementation, including transparent communication with voice talent about intended technology usage and ensuring proper compensation structures for digital voice replication.
Legal Protection Strategies: Voice professionals should consider consulting entertainment attorneys specializing in digital rights to review all contractual language related to AI and voice replication before signing performance agreements.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Hi-Rez Studios backflips on AI voice acting plans after voice actors rally on social media Hi-Rez Studios reverses AI voice cloning policy after industry backlash, setting precedent for ethical gaming practices