Examining the controversy around Elden Ring’s DLC Game of the Year nomination and what it means for gaming awards
The Controversial Nomination
The gaming community finds itself embroiled in a heated debate following The Game Awards’ decision to include Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree among its 2024 Game of the Year finalists. This expansion pack’s nomination has raised fundamental questions about what constitutes award-worthy content in today’s gaming landscape.
When The Game Awards unveiled its six contenders for the prestigious 2024 Game of the Year trophy, one entry immediately stood out as unusual. Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree, while critically acclaimed, represents downloadable content rather than a standalone release. This marks the first time a DLC expansion has received a GOTY nomination alongside complete games like Astro Bot, Balatro, Black Myth: Wukong, Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, and Metaphor: Refantazio.
Historical context provides crucial perspective. Elden Ring originally claimed the Game of the Year title in 2022, achieving what many considered a perfect victory. FromSoftware’s masterpiece shattered commercial expectations by moving 25 million copies before its expansion even launched. The base game secured its place among the top 50 best-selling titles in gaming history, a remarkable accomplishment for a challenging action RPG.
Shadow of the Erdtree arrived in June 2023 to universal acclaim, with many publications awarding perfect scores. Critics praised how the expansion provided a satisfying conclusion to the game’s narrative while introducing substantial new gameplay elements. However, this quality recognition now collides with philosophical questions about award categories and their intended purpose.
The core debate centers on whether expansion content should compete directly against complete, standalone releases. Some argue this creates an uneven playing field, while others maintain that exceptional creative work deserves recognition regardless of format. This controversy highlights how gaming’s evolving content delivery models challenge traditional award structures.
Community Reactions and Industry Voices
The eligibility clarification came directly from The Game Awards organizers ahead of nomination announcements. On November 16, industry insider Wario 64 reported the official stance: “Expansion packs, new game seasons, DLCs, remakes, and remasters qualify for all categories when the jury determines the creative and technical achievements merit consideration.” This policy statement confirmed that the nomination resulted from deliberate judgment rather than oversight.
Prominent Twitch personality Lirik voiced immediate opposition to this approach. “DLCs and remakes deserve separate categories from Game of the Year – this should be self-evident,” he argued. His perspective reflects concerns that expansion content benefits from established foundations, while new games must prove themselves from scratch.
DLC/Remakes should be separated from categories like GOTY – isn’t this obvious? https://t.co/5pAOTOwRJt
Content creator Night Sky expanded on this sentiment, acknowledging the expansion’s quality while questioning the precedent. “Nobody credible disputes Shadow of the Erdtree’s excellence, but this feels like finding justification to award Elden Ring Game of the Year honors twice.” This captures the community’s mixed feelings – admiration for the content coupled with concern about award integrity.
I don’t think a single person alive with any credibility is questioning the quality of Shadow of the Erdtree, but this really does feel like an excuse to give Elden Ring goty twice.
YouTuber announces Elden Ring lore book set to span over 400 pages
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 sets new record at The Game Awards 2025: All winners & nominees
Elden Ring Nightreign gets even harder with “high difficulty” Deep of Night mode
Practical tip for evaluating award controversies: Consider both the creative achievement and the context of its creation. When assessing whether DLC deserves GOTY recognition, ask yourself: Does this expansion represent enough new creative work to stand alongside original releases? Would it succeed as a standalone product? These questions help separate genuine achievement from brand loyalty.
Understanding Shadow of the Erdtree’s Scope
To properly assess whether Shadow of the Erdtree deserves its nomination, we must examine its actual content volume and quality. The expansion’s main narrative requires 15-20 hours to complete, but completionists investing in all content can expect 40-50 hours of gameplay. This substantial commitment approaches the length of many full-priced indie games.
Quantitative analysis reveals impressive statistics: Players confront 55 unique bosses throughout their journey. The new explorable area measures approximately 40% smaller than the original Lands Between, essentially adding two complete regions to the game world. This scale approaches what some developers package as standalone sequels.
Common mistake when evaluating DLC nominations: Failing to consider technical advancements. Shadow of the Erdtree introduced new enemy AI patterns, weapon mechanics, and environmental interactions that weren’t present in the base game. Award jurors likely considered these innovations alongside content volume when making their determination.
Optimization tip for players approaching the expansion: Unlike the base game’s more open progression, Shadow of the Erdtree benefits from methodical region clearing. The difficulty curve assumes mastery of Elden Ring’s core mechanics, making thorough preparation essential before entering the Realm of Shadow. Veteran players recommend completing specific base-game content to access optimal starting gear.
Comparative analysis reveals that few expansions in gaming history offer this combination of scale, polish, and innovation. Historically, only a handful of DLCs (like Blood and Wine for The Witcher 3) have received similar critical acclaim and content recognition. This context helps explain why The Game Awards jury might consider it exceptional enough to compete with original releases.
Precedent and Future Implications
This nomination establishes a significant precedent that will influence future award seasons. The gaming industry increasingly relies on live service models, seasonal content, and substantial expansions. The Game Awards’ decision signals that exceptional post-launch content deserves the same consideration as initial releases.
Immediate consequences became apparent when examining other 2024 releases. Popular and critically praised titles including HellDivers 2, Silent Hill 2, Tekken 8, and Animal Well failed to secure GOTY nominations. While these games faced stiff competition regardless, the inclusion of an expansion necessarily reduced available slots for original works.
The eligibility question extends beyond Elden Ring. If Shadow of the Erdtree qualifies, should major expansions for Diablo IV or Destiny 2 receive similar consideration? These titles receive substantial seasonal updates that sometimes rival standalone games in scope. The industry now faces defining where to draw the line between substantial update and award-contending content.
Practical tip for developers: Document and highlight technical innovations in expansion content. Award juries appear particularly interested in measurable advancements beyond additional story content. Engine improvements, new gameplay systems, and technical achievements significantly influence nomination decisions under this new paradigm.
Common mistake in award discussions: Assuming all expansions deserve equal consideration. The Game Awards’ criteria specifically mention “new creative and technical work worthy of nomination.” This qualitative standard means most DLC won’t qualify – only exceptional expansions demonstrating substantial innovation will receive nominations moving forward.
Practical Guide to Following Gaming Awards
The gaming community can witness this historic decision unfold during The Game Awards ceremony on December 12 at 7:30 PM Eastern Standard Time. The broadcast will reveal whether Shadow of the Erdtree claims the top prize or whether a traditional standalone release prevails.
Optimization tip for award viewers: Focus on category-specific achievements rather than overall wins. Even if Elden Ring’s expansion doesn’t secure Game of the Year, nominations in categories like Best Art Direction or Best Score/Music indicate where the industry recognizes exceptional work. These specialized recognitions often provide better insights into what the industry values most.
Common mistake when interpreting award results: Confusing popularity with quality. The Game Awards utilize a blended voting system combining jury decisions (90%) with public voting (10%). This structure aims to balance critical assessment with community sentiment, but understanding this balance helps interpret why certain titles receive recognition.
Regardless of the outcome, this controversy has already achieved something important: It has sparked necessary conversations about how we evaluate and categorize gaming content in an era of evolving delivery models. The discussion itself represents progress toward more nuanced appreciation of gaming’s diverse creative expressions.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Game Awards voters slam decision to include Elden Ring DLC in GOTY category Examining the controversy around Elden Ring's DLC Game of the Year nomination and what it means for gaming awards