Pro player Crimsix exposes alleged cheating in Call of Duty ranked leaderboards, sparking community debate about RICOCHET’s effectiveness.
The Accusation: Crimsix Calls Out Top-Ranked Player
The Call of Duty competitive scene faces another integrity crisis as three-time world champion Ian ‘Crimsix’ Porter publicly identifies what he believes to be cheating behavior from a player occupying the second position on the Vanguard ranked leaderboard. This incident occurs amidst growing concerns about hack proliferation in the game’s highest competitive tiers.
Recent history provides context for this suspicion. Previously, player Pplehx inadvertently revealed cheat software during a live stream while maintaining second place in the rankings. Another high-ranked competitor, Cha1n, who frequently teamed with Pplehx, subsequently received a substantial Skill Rating (SR) penalty for those shared matches, despite his prolonged tenure at the top. These events have created an environment where extraordinary performances are immediately scrutinized.
While the Top 250 rankings include numerous verified professional players and dedicated grinders—like Doug ‘Censor’ Martin who recently secured the top spot—Crimsix contends that illicit software remains prevalent among elite competitors. The difficulty lies in objectively distinguishing between preternatural game sense and artificial assistance, a challenge that undermines trust in the ranking system.
Crimsix’s Detailed Account and Social Media Reaction
Crimsix provided a vivid description of the suspect gameplay during an unstreamed ranked session. “I noticed my teammate was using hacks, but he was navigating the map with the exaggerated smoothness of a tech demo at a convention,” he recounted. “In response, the opposing team began deploying obvious aim-lock techniques themselves. When I attempted to report the primary suspect, I discovered he was Top250. Investigating further, I found he held the #2 global position.”
This is not a JakeSucky tweet… pic.twitter.com/6vu49tPpmT
— FaZe Crimsix (@Crimsix) April 21, 2022
Crimsix even messaged top-ranked player Censor to warn him, humorously stating “a hacker is on your tail,” while acknowledging Censor’s legitimate skill with “Doug is undeniable.” This interaction highlights the nuanced relationships within the competitive community, where respect for genuine talent coexists with suspicion of fraud.
The Defense: Denials and Community Division
The accused player, known as JoeDeceives, did not remain silent. He directly engaged Crimsix on Twitter, expressing bewilderment at the severity of the allegation. Multiple community figures, including former world champion Chris ‘Parasite’ Duarte, publicly questioned the accusation, advocating for caution before condemning a player based on subjective observation.
JoeDeceives responded with apparent confusion, tweeting, “LMAO I’m crying,” followed by, “I don’t even know what I could have done to warrant this level of accusation.” This reaction is typical in such disputes, where the accused often claims their performance was simply a combination of luck, favorable circumstances, and peak personal performance.
i didn’t even do that good against him lmao idek what i could have done to have him accuse me to this level
— Joe (@JoeDeceives) April 21, 2022
The community response revealed a deep split. Veteran players familiar with cheat detection sided with Crimsix’s experienced eye, while others warned about the dangers of public accusations without incontrovertible evidence. This division paralyzes effective community-led enforcement and places the burden entirely on official systems.
Shroud left speechless after realizing why he was accused of cheating in ARC Raiders
Warzone cheater gets brutally humiliated as legit player gets revenge on wallhacker
Marvel Rivals deals with cheaters in perfect way & players want CoD to take note
The Bigger Problem: Anti-Cheat Skepticism and Practical Guidance
This controversy underscores persistent weaknesses in Call of Duty’s RICOCHET anti-cheat system. Despite its implementation, player reports of ineffective detection in ranked modes have fostered widespread skepticism. The system’s opacity—players rarely see confirmation of punitive actions—erodes trust and leads to vigilante accusations like Crimsix’s.
Practical Tip for Players: Before reporting someone, review the killcam or theater mode footage multiple times. Look for unnatural tracking through walls (a sign of wallhacks) or instant, jittery snaps to targets (indicative of aimbots). Legitimate high-sensitivity players have smooth, sweeping motions, not mechanical snaps.
Common Mistake to Avoid: Don’t equate high kill counts alone with cheating. Skilled players achieve high kills through map control, spawn prediction, and efficient rotations. Cheaters often have unnatural positioning or knowledge, like consistently pre-aiming corners without audio cues.
Optimization for Advanced Play: To maximize your legitimate ranking potential, focus on mastering spawn logic for each map mode combination. Record your matches to analyze decision-making delays. Use custom games to practice centering (keeping your crosshair at head level where enemies will appear), which is often mistaken for aim-assist by observers. Distinguish yourself from cheaters by developing predictable, reviewable skill.
The ultimate casualty of this environment is the genuine top-tier player. When exceptional gameplay is automatically suspect, it diminishes the achievement of reaching leaderboard heights through practice and game knowledge. Until RICOCHET provides more transparency and demonstrably effective results, the community will remain fractured between accusation and defense, harming the competitive experience for everyone.
No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Crimsix accuses #2 ranked Vanguard player of blatantly hacking with aimbot Pro player Crimsix exposes alleged cheating in Call of Duty ranked leaderboards, sparking community debate about RICOCHET's effectiveness.