Best and worst heroes by winrate at The International 2025. Most picked and banned heroes of TI14

The International 2025 concluded with an impressive victory by Team Falcons over Xtreme Gaming in what many are calling one of the most strategically diverse tournaments in recent years. As professional metas often trickle down to public matches, understanding these hero trends becomes crucial for players looking to improve their gameplay. This comprehensive analysis utilizes data from Spectral.gg, focusing on heroes with significant pick rates to ensure statistical relevance.

For players seeking to understand the evolving meta, our Complete Guide offers additional strategic frameworks that complement these hero-specific insights.

Among the standout performers, Elder Titan emerged as the tournament’s dark horse with an exceptional 80% victory rate across 10 appearances. What makes this achievement particularly remarkable is that both of his losses occurred during the grand finals, suggesting teams only risked picking him in the most critical matches. Following closely, Troll Warlord and Ursa demonstrated why they remain reliable carry options, both maintaining win rates exceeding 70% throughout the competition.

Enigma secured the third position with a respectable 67% success rate, proving that well-executed teamfight ultimates can still decide professional games. These heroes share common traits: strong timing windows and game-changing abilities that punish positional errors.

Strategic takeaway: High-win-rate heroes typically excel in specific game phases. Elder Titan dominates mid-game teamfights, while Troll and Ursa become late-game monsters. Understanding these power spikes is essential for maximizing hero potential.

At the opposite extreme, Timbersaw recorded a perfect 0% win rate across 9 professional games, earning the unfortunate title of TI14’s biggest liability. Even when piloted by specialist players like Malr1ne, the hero failed to secure a single victory, prompting teams to abandon him entirely after initial failures.

Storm Spirit represented another significant disappointment, managing only 5 wins from 20 attempts for a meager 25% success rate. The hero’s poor performance suggests current meta items and lane matchups disadvantage his mobile playstyle. Magnus, Terrorblade, and Dawnbreaker rounded out the bottom performers, all failing to reach even 32% win rates.

Common pitfalls analysis: These underperforming heroes typically suffer from one of three issues: poor laning phase, ineffective item timings, or counter-heavy matchups. Teams should consider these factors during draft phases to avoid automatic disadvantages.

Disruptor dominated the popularity charts with 53 picks throughout TI14, though his suboptimal win rate indicates teams may have overvalued his utility. The hero’s Kinetic Field and Static Storm combination provides incredible area control, but current meta strategies appear to have developed effective counterplays.

Snapfire and Bane followed as secondary favorites, both achieving more respectable performance with over 54% of their games ending in victory. These supports offer reliable lane presence and scaling utility that fits multiple team compositions.

Usage pattern insights: Popular heroes typically offer one of three advantages: flexible lane assignments, strong early game impact, or reliable scaling. Understanding why certain heroes become meta staples helps players anticipate opponent strategies and develop effective counter-drafts.

For players looking to expand their hero pool, our Class Guide provides detailed analysis of role-specific responsibilities that complement these hero selections.

Naga Siren emerged as the most contested hero of TI14, facing an astonishing 128 bans throughout the tournament. Teams allowed her through only 10 times, with one appearance occurring in the grand finals deciding match. This ban priority suggests teams considered her potential game impact too significant to risk facing.

Beastmaster and Earthshaker followed as secondary ban priorities, though both saw significantly more play than Naga Siren. Disruptor represented the only frequently contested hero that teams felt comfortable playing against, appearing in 53 games while still receiving 35 bans.

Tournament trend analysis: The high contest rates for certain heroes indicate specific strategic fears among professional teams. Naga Siren’s split-push potential and late-game scaling apparently posed unacceptable risks for most squads.

Strategic draft consideration: When a hero achieves such high ban rates, it often indicates an imbalance in their kit relative to current meta strategies. Players should monitor these patterns as they often signal upcoming balance changes or emerging strategies.

For weapon-specific strategies that complement hero selections, check our Weapons Unlock guide for complementary gameplay insights.

No reproduction without permission：SeeYouSoon Game Club » Best and worst heroes by winrate at The International 2025. Most picked and banned heroes of TI14 Complete analysis of TI14 hero statistics with strategic insights for Dota 2 players at all skill levels